Balwinder Qazi Harbans Pershad Jaiswal(D) By Lrs. V. Urmila Devi Jaiswal (Dead) By Lrs. in India Harbans Pershad Jaiswal(D) By Lrs. V. Urmila Devi Jaiswal (Dead) By Lrs. [2014] Insc 215 (21 April 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 21 April 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: […]
Vijayander Kumar & Ors. V. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. in India Vijayander Kumar & Ors. V. State Of Rajasthan & Anr. [2014] Insc 89 (11 February 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 11 February 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 89 Text […]
Centre For Public Interest Litigation V. Union Of India & Ors. [2013] Insc 975 (22 October 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 22 October 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 975 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF […]
J. Sundramma V. State Of Karnataka & Anr. in India J. Sundramma V. State Of Karnataka & Anr. [2013] Insc 367 (21 March 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 21 March 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 367 Text of the Court Opinion […]
Tarabai V. Govt. Of Karnataka & Ors. in India Tarabai V. Govt. Of Karnataka & Ors. [2013] Insc 825 (3 September 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 3 September 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 825 Text of the Court Opinion […]
< Previous Part (2) The holder of a mining lease granted on or after the commencement of this Act shall pay royalty in respect of any mineral removed by him from the leased area at the rate for the time being specified in the Second Schedule in respect of that mineral. (3) The Central [...]
< Previous Part 25. Power of High Court to make orders in respect of property vested in Official Trustee.-The High Court may make such orders as it thinks fit respecting any trust property vested in the Official Trustee, or the income or produce thereof 18.Section 26 of the said Act [...]
< Previous Part The learned counsel also referred to the decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Mohansingh Laxmansingh v. Bhanwarlal Rajmal Nahata(2). The High Court seems to have held that on the facts, the statements prepared by the witness in that case did not become primary [...]
< Previous Part 34. In S. Narayanappa V. Commissioner of Income Tax, 977 Bangalore(1) the assessee challenged the action taken under sec. 34 A and amongst others it was contended on his behalf that the reasons which induced the Income-tax Officer to initiate proceedings under sec. 34 [...]
< Previous Part In our view, therefore, the High Court was in error in directing the District Judge to take sufficient security from the opposite party Prativa Bose, the appellant before us. We think the proper course would be to send the case back to the District Judge to decide in his [...]