Ranjit Bapodra

< Previous Part  Though there is some force in the argument advanced by Mr. A. V. Viswanatha Sastry, and, if it were res integra, some of us might be inclined not to agree with the reasoning and the conclusion of the earlier judgment, this Court is bound by its earlier decision and we do [...]

< Previous Part  This Court set aside the declaration granted by the High Court. The ratio in Indian Airlines Corporation case was stated thus The employment of the respondent not being one to an office or status and there being no obligation or restriction in the Act or the rules subject [...]

< Previous Part  (b) any other law in force immediately before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect in so far as it is inconsistent with any of the provisions contained in this Act. A marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of the Act, can only be [...]

< Previous Part  33. This judgment is relatable to the legal profession and we have already noticed the judgments of this Court relating to other professions. Imposition of restrictions is a concept inbuilt into the enjoyment of fundamental rights, as no right can exist without a [...]

< Previous Part 20. The contention raised on behalf of the appellants before us is that Section 129(6) of the Customs Act imposes a complete restriction upon the appellants and, therefore, is unconstitutional. While examining the merit of this contention, we must notice that there is no [...]

< Previous Part The right of eminent domain is the right of the sovereign State, through its regular agencies, to reassert, either temporarily or permanently, its dominion over any portion of the soil of the State including private property without its owner's consent on account of public [...]