Ranjit Jujharsingh Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao V. State Of A.p.& Ors. in India Pasupuleti Siva Ramakrishna Rao V. State Of A.p.& Ors. [2014] Insc 111 (20 February 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 20 February 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 111 Text […]
Ashfaq Ahm V. Namrata Chopra & Ors. in India Ashfaq Ahm V. Namrata Chopra & Ors. [2013] Insc 1126 (17 December 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 17 December 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 1126 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN […]
M/s Mahamaya Gen.finance Co.ltd. V. State Of U.p. & Ors. in India M/s Mahamaya Gen.finance Co.ltd. V. State Of U.p. & Ors. [2014] Insc 254 (8 May 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 8 May 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 254 Text of the […]
Goa Coastal Zone Mg. Auth. V. Rudresh Naik in India Goa Coastal Zone Mg. Auth. V. Rudresh Naik [2013] Insc 865 (23 August 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 23 August 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 865 Text of the Court Opinion IN THE SUPREME […]
< Previous Part or for the public good. In the present case. the ingredient of public good is satisfied. and the only question which arose for decision in the court below and which arises before us. is whether the imputation can be said to have been made in good faith. There is no doubt that [...]
< Previous Part In that case, this Court has observed that there is no provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure for a written statement of the accused being filed at the Sessions stage, and it is in respect of written statements filed at the Sessions stage that it has made the further [...]
< Previous Part and he refers to the fact that the students went on strike and passed resolutions, demanding the rustication of the complainant from the University and also protesting against inaction and partiality of the Principal himself. This confidential report was further inquired [...]
< Previous Part 4 notifications which would have otherwise lost their efficacy and validates acquisitions including orders and see. 6 declarations purported to have been made on the basis of such sec. 4 notifications. Section 4, however, does not contain any provision retrospectively [...]
< Previous Part In Piare Dusadh & others v. The Kink Emperor(1) one of the questions raised was whether it was competent for the Legislature by retrospective legislation to make valid any proceedings which had been had in the courts but which were void for want of jurisdiction over the [...]
< Previous Part any law which directly affects compensation payable in respect of the property acquired or lays down any principles different from those which were already in the Land Acquisition Act of 1894. After the amendment of the Constitution in 1955 the question of adequacy of [...]