Satnam Kilam Mohd.haroon & Ors. V. Union Of India & Anr. [2014] Insc 198 (26 March 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 26 March 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 198 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL […]
Arikala Narasa Reddy V. Venkataram Reddy Reddygari & Anr in India Arikala Narasa Reddy V. Venkataram Reddy Reddygari & Anr [2014] Insc 72 (4 February 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 4 February 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 72 Text […]
Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. V. Rajasthan High Court & Ors. in India Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors. V. Rajasthan High Court & Ors. [2013] Insc 347 (20 March 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 20 March 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 347 […]
Baldev Krishan V. Satya Narain in India Baldev Krishan V. Satya Narain [2013] Insc 806 (27 August 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 27 August 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 806 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF […]
Dulcina Fernandes & Ors. V. Joaquim Xavier Cruz & Anr. in India Dulcina Fernandes & Ors. V. Joaquim Xavier Cruz & Anr. [2013] Insc 956 (8 October 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 8 October 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 956 […]
< Previous Part 61. In Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank & Anr., (2000) 4 SCC 406, a similar question was raised before this Court. There the Court considered two Acts, (i) RDDB Act, 1993 and Companies Act, 1956. It was held that even 61 where a winding up petition was pending or a winding [...]
< Previous Part 12. It may be significant to note at this stage that on 3.4.2006 the BIFR rejected the Reference made by the Company and that on 15.9.2006 another Reference was filed by the respondent-Company which was registered as BIFR Case No.18 of 2006. It is in the said Reference [...]
< Previous Part It must be realised that in the modern industrial environment large industries are generally financed by banks and statutory corporations created specially for that purpose and if they are permitted to resort to independent action in total disregard of the pending inquiry under [...]
< Previous Part 17. At the outset, it may be noted that the High Court had disposed of the petitions only on one ground as to applicability of SICA and held that the proceedings were barred under Section 22 of the said Act. This is amply clear from paragraph 13 of the order which reads as [...]
< Previous Part inasmuch as a decree was passed in terms of the award, the defendant as a party to the reference is not entitled to contest its finality and to request that the case should be heard again. Wallis, C.J., said: I think a reference of the suit to the presiding judge must be [...]