Sukhwinder Parimoo Sidhartha Sarawgi V. Board Of Trustees For Port Of Kolkata&or in India Sidhartha Sarawgi V. Board Of Trustees For Port Of Kolkata&or [2014] Insc 212 (16 April 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 16 April 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC 212 […]
M.d.orissa S.h.w.coop.sty.ltd. V. Satyanarayan Pattnaik & Anr in India M.d.orissa S.h.w.coop.sty.ltd. V. Satyanarayan Pattnaik & Anr [2014] Insc 86 (11 February 2014) Court Judgment Information Year: 2014 Date: 11 February 2014 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2014] INSC […]
Gurdip Singh V. State Of Punjab in India Gurdip Singh V. State Of Punjab [2013] Insc 822 (3 September 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 3 September 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 822 Text of the Court Opinion IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA […]
Lokesh Kumar Jain V. State Of Rajasthan in India Lokesh Kumar Jain V. State Of Rajasthan [2013] Insc 667 (9 July 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 9 July 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 667 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN THE SUPREME […]
M. Manohar Reddy & Anr. V. Union Of India & Ors. [2013] Insc 212 (4 February 2013) Court Judgment Information Year: 2013 Date: 4 February 2013 Court: Supreme Court of India INSC: [2013] INSC 212 Text of the Court Opinion (Refortable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL […]
< Previous Part Another exception to the aforementioned general rule was noticed in Bhuri Nath and Others etc. vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others reported in (1997) 2 SCC 745, where the Governor was to chair the Board in terms of the Jammu and Kashmir Shri Mata Vaishno Devi [...]
< Previous Part Since fair opportunity of hearing was not provided to the petitioners the order dated September 4 (sic 6) 2001 of AAIFR dismissing the appeal is vitiated being opposed to the principles of natural justice. Although, the order dated September 4 (sic 6) of 2001 has been [...]
< Previous Part (4) It is neither advisable, nor feasible, nor judicially permissible to draw or prescribe an outer limit for conclusion of all criminal proceedings. The time-limits or bars of limitation prescribed in the several directions made in Common Cause (I), Raj Deo Sharma (I) [...]
< Previous Part In the case of Vidya Sagar v. Smt. Sudesh Kumari and others, AIR 1975 S.C.2295, an objection was taken under Section 47 of the Code to the effect that decree passed was incapable of execution after passing of U.P.Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and the objection [...]
< Previous Part In this appeal decree holder-appellant has challenged the judgment rendered by Patna High Court whereby revision application has been allowed, order passed by the executing Court, rejecting objection under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as [...]